Tuesday, November 29, 2005

From Professor Myers, I find the website Fundies Say the Darndest Things. Professor Myers quotes some gems:


  • On evolution:
    god exists because evolution would have given me eyes in the back of my head if there really were such a thing.

  • In a similar vein, on genetics:
    What strikes me as odd that is, given the current state of genetics, no one has compared simian dna to homo sapien. The differences should be obvious and radical.

  • And in the comments of the post that introduced Professor Myers to this website, a close second favorite of mine about cows:
    "Did you know that all bulls are males? How can these bulls mate to have more bulls? It's your funeral evolutionists. Admit evolution is a pathetic fantasy created by scientists because they can't accept God."

    Eternal, Internet Infidels


    "[After being told 'they mate with cows, you idiot']

    Then, why don't the bulls that are born have some bull like features and cow spots? If a bull mates with a cow, wouldn't you get a female eventually? Evolution is dead water."

    Eternal, Internet Infidels

  • And my favorite, astronomy:
    One of the most basic laws in the universe is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This states that as time goes by, entropy in an environment will increase. Evolution argues differently against a law that is accepted EVERYWHERE BY EVERYONE. Evolution says that we started out simple, and over time became more complex. That just isn't possible: UNLESS there is a giant outside source of energy supplying the Earth with huge amounts of energy. If there were such a source, scientists would certainly know about it.

  • [Edit] Oooh... someone pointed out one in comments that may just top the above one:
    "[A series of posts submitted collectively]

    [Page 1]
    Note: Humans are mammals - not animals

    [Page 2]
    When you can show me an animal (that are not mammal) that its milk is produced by modified sweat glands called 'mammary' glands and have a diaphragm (which is a shelf of muscle extending across the bottom of the ribcage).

    If you can produce this animal (not mammal) then I'll consider your logic.. Until such time mammals are not animals..

    [Another post]
    This is what the evolutionists are reduced to Dion.. Debating whether mammals are animals.. Anyone that spends 5 sec in the dictionary and reads any science literature conclude mammals are not animals..

    [After someone mentions just going to a dictionary to seeKingdom Animalia includes mammals]
    Now Laoldar says "Kingdom Animalia" include mammals

    Lets go to the dictionary
    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Kingdom Animalia
    taxonomic kingdom comprising all living or extinct animals [syn: Animalia, kingdom Animalia, animal kingdom] Do you see mammals listed?.. Didn't think so
    ....
    Nobody in science would conclude mammals are animals - except atheists to push they're agenda and a few evolutionists trying to cover-up Darwin's error..

    [Page 5]
    Kingdom Animalia, just like any other word or phrase (such as God, or God's kingdom) is only valid for those that believe in it..

    [Another post]
    Oh, I see.. this is the same as motor vehicles (as Kingdom Animalia), under that comes trucks (as mammals) and motorcycles (as animals)"

No comments: