Friday, October 21, 2005

Intelligent Design claims that it is science. If so, it would present papers that are peer-reviewed, right? Which is what Michael Behe, inventor of "irreducible complexity", claims is the case:

At the same time, Behe agreed, when asked by plaintiff's counsel Eric Rothschild if the "peer review for Darwin's Black Box was analogous to peer review in the [scientific] literature." It was, according to Behe, even more rigorous. There were more than twice standard the number of reviewers and "they read [the book] more carefully... because this was a controversial topic."


But I'm sure you've already realized better by now.

No comments: