tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6787749441498296444.post7850205228890265426..comments2023-10-22T11:38:45.970-04:00Comments on Dead Racists Society: A bit late, but I felt the point worthy of being madeSkemonohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05740893771784746779noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6787749441498296444.post-50523837067213111462008-04-15T17:45:00.000-04:002008-04-15T17:45:00.000-04:00Your point was made beautifully.Reading the rest o...<I>Your point was made beautifully.</I><BR/>Reading the rest of your comment, I am thinking this was sarcastic, but thank you anyways.<BR/><BR/><I>I just hope anti animal rights people will someday realize that there is a real and huge difference between testing scientifically to help animals and humans, and poring Draino down the throats of dogs or dripping chemicals into rabbits eyes and forcing primates to inhale cigarette smoke in order for major corporations to cover their asses with their ridiculous warning labels and "new and improved" claims.</I><BR/>Because all scientists are really just shills for evil tobacco industries who insist that these scientists torture animals in order to maximize the company's profits, right? Is that the logic, such as it is?<BR/><BR/><I>Can we all at least agree that animals should not be caged for life, scared daily, inflicted with pain continuously and treated as lifeless trash.</I><BR/>What scientists <I>do</I> treat their test subjects as "lifeless trash"? Have you ever actually spoken with a scientist who does work with animals?<BR/><BR/><I>And if you can't agree to that, then do you really care about human suffering at all, unless of course it is your own?</I><BR/>Yes. Yes I do.<BR/><BR/><I>One more thing, if you are naive enough to believe that the regulations in place to police the suffering of lab animals are really followed, then you are the dream come true to these corporations looking for the next idiot to believe their so called "new and improved" ads.</I><BR/>I'm sure that there are going to be cases where the regulations are not followed to the letter, sure. There are bound to be exceptions. Do you have any evidence that these abuses of the system are widespread, though?<BR/><BR/><I>Sadly it is all about money, the more tests they run the more claims they can make, the more the products fly off the shelves.</I><BR/>Um, no. It's about making products safe for consumption. Companies would <I>love</I> it if they didn't have to test their products for safety--they'd get <I>so</I> much more money if that were the case. Your claim is a complete inversion of reality.Skemonohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05740893771784746779noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6787749441498296444.post-45561515171654398382008-04-15T17:30:00.000-04:002008-04-15T17:30:00.000-04:00Your point was made beautifully. I just hope anti ...Your point was made beautifully. I just hope anti animal rights people will someday realize that there is a real and huge difference between testing scientifically to help animals and humans, and poring Draino down the throats of dogs or dripping chemicals into rabbits eyes and forcing primates to inhale cigarette smoke in order for major corporations to cover their asses with their ridiculous warning labels and "new and improved" claims. Can we all at least agree that animals should not be caged for life, scared daily, inflicted with pain continuously and treated as lifeless trash. And if you can't agree to that, then do you really care about human suffering at all, unless of course it is your own? One more thing, if you are naive enough to believe that the regulations in place to police the suffering of lab animals are really followed, then you are the dream come true to these corporations looking for the next idiot to believe their so called "new and improved" ads. Sadly it is all about money, the more tests they run the more claims they can make, the more the products fly off the shelves.Louisehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04666345189707395461noreply@blogger.com